Procurement Transformation Starts with Process Visibility—Not Just New Tools

Procurement transformation is no longer about simply upgrading software or digitizing sourcing documents—it’s about rethinking how procurement operates at every level. From supplier onboarding to purchase order (PO) approvals, most transformation efforts fail because they ignore the real friction hidden in day-to-day workflows. Without visibility into how procurement teams actually create POs, manage vendors, and navigate compliance checks, digital tools fall short—leading to delays, duplication, and frustrated stakeholders.

ClearWork enables successful procurement transformation by capturing real-time process data across sourcing platforms, ERP systems, and vendor portals. We map how work truly gets done—highlighting bottlenecks, approval gaps, and automation opportunities. Whether you're modernizing your procurement function or integrating AI into vendor management, ClearWork delivers a transparent, data-driven foundation to drive measurable results and lasting process improvement.

Procurement team members analyzing current state and challenges with their process using clearwork
Future procurement system optimized after transformation with clearwork
CPO showing the value and success of the transformation project using clearwork

ClearWork Enables Transformation Across The 5 Key Project Stages

1. Discovering Current State

Gain objective, real-time insights into "as-is" processes and user activities.

2. Designing Future State

Define precise requirements and optimize workflows based on factual data.

3. Deploying Your Solution

Ensure alignment between new tech and actual operational needs, reducing rework.

4. Go-Live & Steady State

Boost user adoption with a contextually aware AI Co-Pilot and a more intuitive work experience.

5. Continuous Improvement: Continuously monitor and identify opportunities for ongoing optimization and automation

Current State: How Challenges Are Discovered

five procurement leads using clearwork automated process discovery to determine the current state

🔴 Traditional Approach

  1. - Consultants conduct limited interviews with procurement leads to surface perceived delays in purchase order creation, vendor onboarding, and compliance.
  2. - No end-to-end tracking of workflows—missing details like back-and-forth in vendor validation, delays in approvals, or repeated manual tasks.
  3. - Common friction points (e.g., PO duplication, sourcing cycle bottlenecks, approval gaps) go undocumented and unresolved.
  4. - Procurement teams are excluded from shaping the change, leading to resistance later.
  5. - No behavioral or process data is captured—limiting the potential for automation, AI, or accurate root cause analysis.
📉 Result: As McKinsey and Third Stage Consulting emphasize, procurement transformations frequently fail due to vague requirements, lack of behavioral insight, and poor cross-functional alignment

✅ ClearWork Approach

  1. - Captures real-time activity across sourcing platforms, ERP systems, vendor portals, and communication tools like email or Teams.
  2. - Tracks how long it actually takes to create a PO, review bids, complete compliance steps, and manage approvals.
  3. - Maps out friction areas such as policy exceptions, duplicate entries, or missed SLAs.
  4. - Benchmarks actual workflows against procurement SOPs and approval matrices.
  5. - Includes input from staff to surface operational pain points and context.
📈 Benefit: Provides a granular, people-first view of how procurement functions—revealing inefficiencies, inconsistencies, and opportunities for optimization or automation.

Future State: What Gets Designed and Why

Three procurement users designing the future state process based on current challenges derived in clearwork

🔴 Traditional Approach

  1. - Platforms are selected to address assumed pain points (e.g., PO delays or inconsistent vendor data) without validating the root causes.
  2. - Functional requirements are vague—missing workflow variations or compliance detail.
  3. - Design lacks visibility into sourcing, contracting, or invoice-matching nuances.
  4. - Policy enforcement is added as an afterthought, leading to end-user friction.
⚠️ Risk: As McKinsey reports, lack of alignment between business needs and tech design is one of the top reasons for transformation failure.

✅ ClearWork Approach

  1. - Uses real usage data to define functional requirements and process flows across procurement, finance, and vendor operations.
  2. - Maps capabilities like automated vendor scoring, PO lifecycle tracking, SLA monitoring, and compliance validation.
  3. - Validates future-state design with the users who live the process—ensuring the right level of control, automation, and usability.
  4. - Uncovers which policies cause friction and where smart automation or pre-validation can reduce user effort.
Advantage: Prevents design missteps and aligns new solutions with how procurement actually happens—not how it’s assumed to.

Deployment: How the Solution Is Built

Process diagram showing the complexity of procurement processes before transformation with clearwork

🔴 Traditional Approach

  1. - New systems are deployed with minimal user input and disconnected from real workflows.
  2. - Training is generic and often fails to reflect the actual approval chains, sourcing tasks, or documentation requirements.
  3. - Manual processes persist beneath the surface, undermining adoption.
  4. - Policies and controls are inconsistently applied—or ignored altogether.
🚫 Missed Opportunity: Forbes highlights that most failed digital initiatives underestimate the importance of change management and day-one usability.
🚫
Failure Point: Requirements gaps drive 30–50% rework, delaying ROI and increasing cost

✅ ClearWork Approach

  1. - Targets known friction points—like approval lag, manual vendor onboarding, and rework in PO creation.
  2. - Guides deployment around clearly mapped user journeys and observed workflow pain.
  3. - Training is contextualized to specific user roles, tasks, and tools—reducing confusion and dependency on post-launch support.
  4. - Policy compliance is embedded directly into daily workflows, not layered on top.
Outcome: A faster, cleaner deployment that fits how people work—minimizing risk, improving compliance, and shortening procurement cycles.

Go-Live: What the User Experiences

Employee adopting the new procurement system with the help of the clearwork AI Co-Pilot

🔴 Traditional Approach

  1. - Staff must adapt to complex new systems with little real-time support or task-specific help.
  2. - Errors spike in early PO submissions, vendor setup, and sourcing tasks.
  3. - Compliance steps are missed, and trust in the system erodes.
  4. - Frustration rises, and staff revert to legacy tools or offline workarounds.
⚠️ Problem: Without embedded guidance, adoption stalls—making even the best-designed systems ineffective.
⚠️ Consequence: 69% of employees report tech frustration. Poor experience drives poor morale.

✅ ClearWork Approach

  1. - ClearWork Co-pilot offers in-browser guidance for every key procurement activity—from vendor scoring and sourcing to PO approvals and compliance validation.
  2. - Offers contextual help during task execution, not just static training.
  3. - Flags missing documentation, policy gaps, or missteps in real-time—keeping users on track and reducing error rates.
  4. - Learns from usage to improve recommendations and reduce user workload.
Benefit: Confidence improves, adoption accelerates, and cycle times drop—with less need for back-end correction or retraining.

Continuous Improvement: From Launch to Long-Term Value

CPO showing the value of the procurement transformation using Clearwork

🔴 Traditional Approach

  1. - Once deployed, there’s no structured method to monitor procurement behavior or process adherence.
  2. - Vendor performance tracking is fragmented and often delayed.
  3. - Feedback loops are manual and periodic—leading to lagging updates and outdated SOPs.
  4. - Automation efforts stall without insight into where they’re needed most.
📉 As BCG warns, many organizations fail to measure or evolve their transformations, dooming them to stagnation.

✅ ClearWork Approach

  1. - Continuously captures usage trends, exception paths, and compliance breakdowns.
  2. - Highlights missed approvals, duplicate effort, and repetitive tasks ripe for automation.
  3. - SOPs and documentation evolve based on real user actions—not top-down revisions.
  4. - Provides leaders with dashboards to proactively manage workload, enforce policy, and drive efficiency.
🔁 Impact: Procurement evolves into a resilient, insight-led function—constantly improving and increasingly automated.

Why ClearWork Outperforms the Traditional Model

✅ ClearWork Approach

  1. - Real-time capture of sourcing, PO, and approval activity
  2. - Workflow-mapped capabilities validated by user behavior
  3. - Targeted rollout with aligned training and policy-embedded automation
  4. - Co-pilot guidance in context—helping users do the work right
  5. - Real-time usage insights fuel continuous optimization and automation

🔴 Traditional Approach

  1. - Interviews and assumptions, no real workflow data
  2. - Assumed pain points and vague requirements
  3. - Misaligned systems, unclear scope, generic training
  4. - No in-task support, high error rate, low adoption
  5. - No feedback loop, stagnant tools

ClearWork turns procurement from reactive and repetitive to intelligent and strategic—ensuring every process, policy, and platform delivers measurable value.

Let's Get Started