ERP, CRM and other major enterprise system transformations promise better visibility, streamlined operations, and unified data—but these outcomes hinge on one thing: how well the organization and its consulting partners understand the business before implementation begins.
Discovery and requirements gathering represent the most critical, sensitive, and failure-prone stage of any ERP/CRM engagement. When these steps are rushed, inconsistent, or incomplete, the downstream consequences are predictable:
Despite their importance, most firms still rely on manual, workshop-heavy, highly subjective discovery methods—methods that haven’t meaningfully evolved since the 1990s.
This article outlines how consulting firms run ERP/CRM discovery today, why it’s so challenging, and how organizations can approach this process more effectively—ultimately paving the way for automation and AI to improve the outcomes without replacing the expertise consultants provide.
Most ERP/CRM discovery processes follow the same pattern across consulting firms—regardless of industry, technology, or methodology. It typically includes several components:
Before formal workshops begin, consultants may review:
In reality, this stage is frequently superficial. Documentation is incomplete or outdated; stakeholders are identified late; and consultants enter discovery with limited visibility.
Workshops remain the primary mechanism for uncovering how the business operates today. These sessions focus on workstreams such as:
Workshops usually include business SMEs, process owners, IT analysts, and a consulting facilitator.
But workshops create challenges:
After workshops, consultants translate conversations into:
The quality ranges from polished process maps to hurried screenshots of whiteboards. Many organizations never achieve unified, standardized documentation across all workstreams.
From the captured information, consulting teams produce:
These are structured into documents like:
This is perhaps the most time-consuming and error-prone portion of the process.
Consultants compare requirements to ERP/CRM capabilities to determine:
Where this is done well, customizations are minimized. Where it is done poorly, ERP/CRM systems become overly complex—and technical debt accumulates before go-live.
Requirements ultimately flow into:
By the end of discovery, the organization should have a clear, validated, actionable understanding of what the future-state solution must achieve.
Too often, they don’t.
ERP and CRM discovery is hard not because businesses are complex—but because the way we capture complexity is deeply flawed.
Below are the biggest systemic problems.
ERP/CRM discovery often requires 80–200 consultant hours per project.
Most of that time is:
Small and mid-sized consulting firms struggle most under this burden.
Workshops often surface the “official” version of processes—not the messy, real workflows that frontline employees actually perform. These hidden tasks and workarounds become the root cause of failed adoption.
Requirements, notes, screenshots, process maps, and workshop artifacts end up in:
This fragmentation creates gaps, contradictions, and rework.
Getting the right SMEs in the room is hard. Getting all SMEs in the room consistently is impossible. Asynchronous input is rare in the traditional model.
Teams frequently describe what they used to do in the old system—leading to:
Two consultants may deliver completely different interpretations of the same requirement, depending on their:
Today’s ERP/CRM platforms evolve rapidly—monthly updates, new features, new integrations. Meanwhile, discovery outputs remain static, stored in documents that are outdated as soon as they are published.
The result is a widening gap between:
Organizations and consulting firms need a new model—one that is structured, iterative, and scalable.
Below is a modern blueprint for discovery that reduces risk, increases clarity, and improves alignment.
Discovery should begin with a clear understanding of:
Without this, requirements become wish lists instead of business-aligned deliverables.
A strong plan defines:
The plan should also set expectations for cross-functional collaboration.
Gather:
Most organizations have more documentation than they realize—though much of it is scattered and inconsistent.
Use a combination of:
The goal is not just to document how things work, but to understand why.
Future-state mapping should focus on:
This is where transformation actually begins.
Use structured templates to gather:
Requirements should be solution-neutral until compared against product capabilities.
With requirements captured, evaluate:
This step prevents unnecessary customization and helps control long-term cost.
Use proven prioritization techniques such as:
This informs:
Review documentation with business leaders and SMEs:
Validation strengthens adoption and reduces later rework.
Finally, produce:
This forms the foundation for design, configuration, and testing.
ERP/CRM discovery is ripe for transformation.
Automation and AI can significantly reduce repetitive, low-value activities such as:
The goal is not to replace consultants - but to free them from administrative work so they can focus on insight, alignment, and strategy.
ERP and CRM discovery cannot rely on outdated workshop-heavy approaches forever. Businesses are moving faster. Systems are more complex. Data is more fragmented. And project timelines are under more pressure than ever.
Organizations need discovery methods that are:
Automation is emerging as a powerful enabler of this new model.
To explore a modern approach to discovery and requirements generation powered by AI, you can learn more here:
👉 https://www.clearwork.io/clearwork-automated-discovery
Discovery sets the foundation for scope, design, integration decisions, data strategy, and testing—so unclear or incomplete requirements almost always lead to delays, budget overruns, and rework later in the project.
Consulting teams rely heavily on workshops, verbal SME knowledge, and scattered documentation, making it difficult to fully capture edge cases, workarounds, and cross-functional dependencies that drive system behavior.
Document ingestion, stakeholder questionnaires, transcript analysis, first-draft requirements, process flow generation, and even fit–gap summaries can be automated—allowing consultants to focus on decisions, not documentation.
By shifting to hybrid discovery models (async + live workshops), reusing standardized templates, using AI to draft requirements, and maintaining requirements as a living, traceable system instead of a static document.
ClearWork uses AI to accelerate and standardize the entire discovery cycle—turning documents, SME inputs, and workshop content into structured requirements, process flows, and fit–gap insights that consulting teams can validate and refine, saving weeks of manual effort.
ERP and CRM implementations often succeed or fail based on the strength of the discovery and requirements process, yet most firms still rely on manual workshops and fragmented documentation that slow projects down and introduce risk. A modern, hybrid approach—blending structured methods, asynchronous input, and AI-assisted requirements generation—helps teams complete discovery faster while capturing more complete and traceable requirements. If your firm is ready to modernize this critical project phase, explore how ClearWork Automated Discovery supports teams with greater accuracy, speed, and consistency.
Enjoy our newsletter!
